Diego Simeone Questions VAR Decision in Atletico’s Shootout Heartbreak
Atletico Madrid’s Champions League dreams were shattered in a penalty shootout against rivals Real Madrid, but the real talking point wasn’t the result—it was Julian Alvarez‘s controversially disallowed penalty. Manager Diego Simeone didn’t hold back in his post-match press conference, challenging journalists and fans alike to scrutinize the VAR call that ruled out Alvarez’s seemingly successful spot-kick.
“Did you see it? Did he touch the ball twice? Don’t be afraid to speak,” Simeone demanded, his frustration palpable. The Argentine forward’s penalty was initially celebrated after rattling the crossbar and bouncing in, only for VAR to intervene minutes later, citing a double touch. Replays showed Alvarez slipping during his run-up, with debate raging over whether his standing foot made contact.
The Rulebook vs. Common Sense: Was the Call Justified?
Under Law 14.1 of the IFAB rules, any secondary contact with the ball during a penalty invalidates the attempt. However, former Premier League referee Mark Clattenburg, speaking to Jw7, noted: “The spirit of the law matters. If the touch is accidental and doesn’t influence the shot’s trajectory, discretion should apply.”
Real Madrid boss Carlo Ancelotti defended the decision: “VAR spotted it—he clearly touched it twice.” But Spanish outlet SPORT argued: “No image conclusively shows Alvarez‘s foot grazed the ball. This was overreach by VAR.”
Goalkeepers Weigh In: Oblak’s Class vs. Courtois’ Pragmatism
Atletico goalkeeper Jan Oblak took the high road: “We must respect the referee, even if it’s painful.” His Real counterpart Thibaut Courtois, however, revealed he alerted officials to the potential infraction: “I felt the double touch. Technology confirmed it.”
Defender Clement Lenglet summed up Atletico’s bewilderment: “I’ve never seen this called before. If it’s the rule, fine—but it feels cruel.”
UEFA’s Stance and What’s Next
UEFA confirmed Alvarez’s faint contact violated the current law but acknowledged the need for review: “Unintentional double touches may warrant rule flexibility.” With Arsenal awaiting Real in the quarters, this incident reignites debates about VAR’s role in football’s most dramatic moments.
Jw7 Insight: While rules are clear, their application in high-stakes scenarios demands nuance. Was justice served, or did rigidity overshadow fairness? Share your thoughts below!
Oblak’s dignity in defeat contrasted with the night’s controversy
For more tactical breakdowns and bold analysis, stay tuned to Jw7—where football isn’t just watched, it’s understood.
